Nathan vs Tarragindi, QLD Suburb Comparison

Nathan for retirees; Tarragindi for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

NathanTarragindi

Overall score

Nathan

59.9/100

Tarragindi

71.6/100

Crime rate

Nathan

88.8 / 1k

Tarragindi

42.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Nathan

139

Tarragindi

720

Population

Nathan

1,085

Tarragindi

11,035

Metric leadNathan 1Tarragindi 101 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNathanTarragindi
Overall score59.9/10071.6/100
Housing (desirability)42.5/10053.6/100
Crime rate88.8 / 1k42.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools57
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves114
Public transport stops1184
Walkability47.5/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities139720
Green cover16.2%8.6%
Population1,08511,035
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Nathan is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Tarragindi is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Nathan tends to lead on an affluent, sought-after address and highly regarded local schools, while Tarragindi stands out for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Tarragindi, while Nathan remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons