Overall score
Mount Gravatt
59.2/100
Nathan
58.7/100
Mount Gravatt vs Nathan, QLD suburb comparison
Nathan for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Mount GravattNathan
Crime rate
Mount Gravatt
60.7 / 1k
Nathan
50.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Gravatt
237
Nathan
119
Population
Mount Gravatt
3,733
Nathan
1,085
Metric leadMount Gravatt 7Nathan 3across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Gravatt | Nathan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.2/100 | 58.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.6/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 60.7 / 1k | 50.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 25 | 11 |
| Walkability | 73.0/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 237 | 119 |
| Population | 3,733 | 1,085 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Mount Gravatt reads as a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks; Nathan is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by. Mount Gravatt sits among greener hillside streets, while Nathan keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Mount Gravatt is stronger for parks and reserves and public transport access; Nathan answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Choose Mount Gravatt if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Nathan for investors and value-focused buyers.