Ilkley vs Mooloolah Valley, QLD Suburb Comparison

Ilkley for schools; Mooloolah Valley for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

IlkleyMooloolah Valley

Overall score

Ilkley

39.3/100

Mooloolah Valley

55.4/100

Crime rate

Ilkley

18.6 / 1k

Mooloolah Valley

27.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ilkley

0

Mooloolah Valley

66

Population

Ilkley

812

Mooloolah Valley

3,629

Metric leadIlkley 1Mooloolah Valley 62 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryIlkleyMooloolah Valley
Overall score39.3/10055.4/100
Housing (desirability)22.4/10054.8/100
Crime rate18.6 / 1k27.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves—17
Public transport stops—3
Walkability0.0/10056.5/100
Nearby amenities066
Green cover0.4%2.5%
Population8123,629
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Ilkley is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, and Mooloolah Valley is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote. Ilkley sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Mooloolah Valley is more regionally self-contained.

Ilkley tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, while Mooloolah Valley stands out for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. Ilkley generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Mooloolah Valley leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mooloolah Valley, while Ilkley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons