Ilkley vs Tanawha, QLD Suburb Comparison

Tanawha for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

IlkleyTanawha

Overall score

Ilkley

39.3/100

Tanawha

55.8/100

Crime rate

Ilkley

18.6 / 1k

Tanawha

23.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ilkley

0

Tanawha

36

Population

Ilkley

812

Tanawha

1,312

Metric leadIlkley 1Tanawha 71 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryIlkleyTanawha
Overall score39.3/10055.8/100
Housing (desirability)22.4/10023.7/100
Crime rate18.6 / 1k23.1 / 1k
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves—1
Public transport stops—2
Walkability0.0/1003.0/100
Nearby amenities036
Green cover0.4%8.9%
Population8121,312
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Ilkley reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Tanawha is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand.

On the data, Ilkley is stronger for a quieter safety profile; Tanawha answers with housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. Ilkley generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Tanawha leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Tanawha, while Ilkley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons