Iluka vs Kinross, WA suburb comparison

Iluka for retirees and beach lifestyle; Kinross for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

IlukaKinross

Overall score

Iluka

52.9/100

Kinross

64.6/100

Crime rate

Iluka

1631.5 / 1k

Kinross

1335.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Iluka

39

Kinross

131

Population

Iluka

5,669

Kinross

6,988

Metric leadIluka 2Kinross 71 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryIlukaKinross
Overall score52.9/10064.6/100
Housing (desirability)94.9/10076.0/100
Crime rate1631.5 / 1k1335.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools55
Parks & reserves26
Public transport stops1742
Walkability31.5/10084.0/100
Nearby amenities39131
Population5,6696,988
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Iluka reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Kinross is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Where Iluka is shaped by the coast, Kinross offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Iluka tends to lead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Kinross stands out for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.

Retirees and people chasing a beach lifestyle may find Iluka the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kinross.

Related comparisons