Overall score
Kinross
64.6/100
Ocean Reef
70.8/100
Ocean Reef for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kinross
64.6/100
Ocean Reef
70.8/100
Crime rate
Kinross
1335.8 / 1k
Ocean Reef
1180.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kinross
131
Ocean Reef
58
Population
Kinross
6,988
Ocean Reef
8,125
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kinross | Ocean Reef |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.6/100 | 70.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 94.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 1335.8 / 1k | 1180.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 42 | 41 |
| Walkability | 84.0/100 | 74.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 131 | 58 |
| Population | 6,988 | 8,125 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Kinross is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Ocean Reef is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone. Ocean Reef leans into coastal living, while Kinross feels more inland and suburban in character.
Kinross pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas Ocean Reef is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Ocean Reef, while Kinross remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.