Kinross vs Ocean Reef, WA suburb comparison

Ocean Reef for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KinrossOcean Reef

Overall score

Kinross

64.6/100

Ocean Reef

70.8/100

Crime rate

Kinross

1335.8 / 1k

Ocean Reef

1180.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kinross

131

Ocean Reef

58

Population

Kinross

6,988

Ocean Reef

8,125

Metric leadKinross 3Ocean Reef 7across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKinrossOcean Reef
Overall score64.6/10070.8/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10094.9/100
Crime rate1335.8 / 1k1180.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools58
Parks & reserves69
Public transport stops4241
Walkability84.0/10074.0/100
Nearby amenities13158
Population6,9888,125
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kinross is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Ocean Reef is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone. Ocean Reef leans into coastal living, while Kinross feels more inland and suburban in character.

Kinross pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas Ocean Reef is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Ocean Reef, while Kinross remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons