Burns Beach vs Ocean Reef, WA suburb comparison

Ocean Reef for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Burns BeachOcean Reef

Overall score

Burns Beach

51.4/100

Ocean Reef

70.8/100

Crime rate

Burns Beach

2298.0 / 1k

Ocean Reef

1180.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Burns Beach

42

Ocean Reef

58

Population

Burns Beach

4,071

Ocean Reef

8,125

Metric leadBurns Beach 0Ocean Reef 82 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBurns BeachOcean Reef
Overall score51.4/10070.8/100
Housing (desirability)94.9/10094.9/100
Crime rate2298.0 / 1k1180.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools38
Parks & reserves49
Public transport stops1641
Walkability26.0/10074.0/100
Nearby amenities4258
Population4,0718,125
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Burns Beach reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Ocean Reef is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone. Burns Beach sits firmly coastal, whereas Ocean Reef is near both coast and city.

Burns Beach tends to lead on an affluent, sought-after address and generous parks and open space, while Ocean Reef stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Ocean Reef, while Burns Beach remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons