Burns Beach vs Currambine, WA Suburb Comparison

Burns Beach for beach lifestyle; Currambine for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Burns BeachCurrambine

Overall score

Burns Beach

43.1/100

Currambine

59.9/100

Crime rate

Burns Beach

32.4 / 1k

Currambine

32.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Burns Beach

72

Currambine

165

Population

Burns Beach

4,071

Currambine

6,834

Metric leadBurns Beach 1Currambine 83 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBurns BeachCurrambine
Overall score43.1/10059.9/100
Housing (desirability)48.6/10059.5/100
Crime rate32.4 / 1k32.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools38
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves49
Public transport stops1616
Walkability26.0/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities72165
Green cover4.0%6.4%
Population4,0716,834
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Burns Beach is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm, and Currambine is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Burns Beach leans into coastal living, while Currambine feels more inland and suburban in character.

Burns Beach pulls ahead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Currambine is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability.

Burns Beach suits people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors more clearly, whereas Currambine is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons