Burns Beach vs Connolly, WA suburb comparison

Burns Beach for beach lifestyle and investment; Connolly for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Burns BeachConnolly

Overall score

Burns Beach

51.4/100

Connolly

61.5/100

Crime rate

Burns Beach

2298.0 / 1k

Connolly

2633.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Burns Beach

42

Connolly

32

Population

Burns Beach

4,071

Connolly

3,675

Metric leadBurns Beach 5Connolly 32 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBurns BeachConnolly
Overall score51.4/10061.5/100
Housing (desirability)94.9/10076.0/100
Crime rate2298.0 / 1k2633.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools310
Parks & reserves44
Public transport stops1610
Walkability26.0/10063.0/100
Nearby amenities4232
Population4,0713,675
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Burns Beach reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Connolly is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel. Burns Beach leans into coastal living, while Connolly feels more inland and suburban in character.

Burns Beach tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Connolly stands out for walkability and overall desirability.

Burns Beach suits people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors more clearly, whereas Connolly is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons