Overall score
Burns Beach
51.4/100
Connolly
61.5/100
Burns Beach for beach lifestyle and investment; Connolly for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Burns Beach
51.4/100
Connolly
61.5/100
Crime rate
Burns Beach
2298.0 / 1k
Connolly
2633.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Burns Beach
42
Connolly
32
Population
Burns Beach
4,071
Connolly
3,675
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Burns Beach | Connolly |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.4/100 | 61.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 94.9/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 2298.0 / 1k | 2633.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 10 |
| Walkability | 26.0/100 | 63.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 42 | 32 |
| Population | 4,071 | 3,675 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Burns Beach reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Connolly is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel. Burns Beach leans into coastal living, while Connolly feels more inland and suburban in character.
Burns Beach tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Connolly stands out for walkability and overall desirability.
Burns Beach suits people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors more clearly, whereas Connolly is the stronger match for retirees and families.