Burns Beach vs Connolly, WA Suburb Comparison

Burns Beach for beach lifestyle; Connolly for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Burns BeachConnolly

Overall score

Burns Beach

43.1/100

Connolly

60.2/100

Crime rate

Burns Beach

32.4 / 1k

Connolly

32.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Burns Beach

72

Connolly

55

Population

Burns Beach

4,071

Connolly

3,675

Metric leadBurns Beach 3Connolly 54 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBurns BeachConnolly
Overall score43.1/10060.2/100
Housing (desirability)48.6/10061.9/100
Crime rate32.4 / 1k32.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools310
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves44
Public transport stops1610
Walkability26.0/10063.0/100
Nearby amenities7255
Green cover4.0%8.2%
Population4,0713,675
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Burns Beach reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Connolly is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Burns Beach leans into coastal living, while Connolly feels more inland and suburban in character.

Burns Beach tends to lead on housing affordability, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Connolly stands out for schools and education options, walkability, and overall desirability.

Burns Beach suits people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Connolly is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons