Connolly vs Kinross, WA Suburb Comparison

Connolly for schools; Kinross for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ConnollyKinross

Overall score

Connolly

60.2/100

Kinross

56.1/100

Crime rate

Connolly

32.4 / 1k

Kinross

32.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Connolly

55

Kinross

154

Population

Connolly

3,675

Kinross

6,988

Metric leadConnolly 5Kinross 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryConnollyKinross
Overall score60.2/10056.1/100
Housing (desirability)61.9/10052.4/100
Crime rate32.4 / 1k32.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools105
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves46
Public transport stops1042
Walkability63.0/10084.0/100
Nearby amenities55154
Green cover8.2%5.9%
Population3,6756,988
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Connolly is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Kinross is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Connolly tends to lead on schools and education options, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Kinross stands out for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Connolly, while Kinross remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons