Connolly vs Kinross, WA suburb comparison

Connolly for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ConnollyKinross

Overall score

Connolly

61.5/100

Kinross

64.6/100

Crime rate

Connolly

2633.3 / 1k

Kinross

1335.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Connolly

32

Kinross

131

Population

Connolly

3,675

Kinross

6,988

Metric leadConnolly 2Kinross 71 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryConnollyKinross
Overall score61.5/10064.6/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate2633.3 / 1k1335.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools105
Parks & reserves46
Public transport stops1042
Walkability63.0/10084.0/100
Nearby amenities32131
Population3,6756,988
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Connolly is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel, and Kinross is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Connolly sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Kinross is in a middle-ring position.

Connolly tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Kinross stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.

Connolly suits retirees more clearly, whereas Kinross is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons