Currambine vs Heathridge, WA Suburb Comparison

Currambine for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CurrambineHeathridge

Overall score

Currambine

59.9/100

Heathridge

50.1/100

Crime rate

Currambine

32.4 / 1k

Heathridge

32.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Currambine

165

Heathridge

98

Population

Currambine

6,834

Heathridge

6,898

Metric leadCurrambine 4Heathridge 62 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCurrambineHeathridge
Overall score59.9/10050.1/100
Housing (desirability)59.5/10071.2/100
Crime rate32.4 / 1k32.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools812
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves911
Public transport stops1644
Walkability80.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities16598
Green cover6.4%9.9%
Population6,8346,898
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/106/10

Comparison summary

Currambine is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Heathridge is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Heathridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Currambine keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Currambine tends to lead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, while Heathridge stands out for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Currambine, while Heathridge remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons