Overall score
Kalangadoo
38.7/100
Mount Burr
51.7/100
Kalangadoo vs Mount Burr, SA Suburb Comparison
Mount Burr for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
KalangadooMount Burr
Crime rate
Kalangadoo
10.7 / 1k
Mount Burr
7.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kalangadoo
0
Mount Burr
22
Population
Kalangadoo
457
Mount Burr
367
Metric leadKalangadoo 1Mount Burr 73 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMount Burr
- Best for familiesMount Burr
- Best for investmentMount Burr
- Best for best valueMount Burr
- Best for best schoolsMount Burr
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kalangadoo | Mount Burr |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.7/100 | 51.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 52.1/100 | 60.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 10.7 / 1k | 7.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 2.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 22 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 6 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 62.3% |
| Population | 457 | 367 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Kalangadoo is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Mount Burr is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Burr sits among greener hillside streets, while Kalangadoo keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Kalangadoo pulls ahead on a larger local community, whereas Mount Burr is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability.
Kalangadoo suits investors more clearly, whereas Mount Burr is the stronger match for families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.