Overall score
Mount Burr
51.7/100
Southend
42.6/100
Mount Burr vs Southend, SA Suburb Comparison
Mount Burr for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Mount BurrSouthend
Crime rate
Mount Burr
7.7 / 1k
Southend
9.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Burr
22
Southend
6
Population
Mount Burr
367
Southend
301
Metric leadMount Burr 8Southend 11 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMount Burr
- Best for familiesMount Burr
- Best for investmentMount Burr
- Best for best valueMount Burr
- Best for best schoolsMount Burr
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Burr | Southend |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.7/100 | 42.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.7/100 | 44.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 7.7 / 1k | 9.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 2.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 22 | 6 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 9 |
| Green cover | 62.3% | 0.0% |
| Population | 367 | 301 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Mount Burr reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Southend is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Mount Burr sits among greener hillside streets, while Southend keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Mount Burr pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability, whereas Southend is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Choose Mount Burr if you are weighing value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools; lean toward Southend for retirees, families, and investors.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.