Kalorama vs Silvan, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Kalorama | Silvan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.5/100 | 45.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 39.0/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 24.3 / 1k | 37.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 21 | 21 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 116 | 10 |
| Planning activity | 23 | 45 |
| Population | 1,277 | 1,323 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Kalorama reads as a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks; Silvan is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Kalorama sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Silvan is further out with more breathing room.
Kalorama pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, whereas Silvan is the better pick for housing affordability and overall desirability. Kalorama generally means more sought-after housing, while Silvan leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Silvan, while Kalorama remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.