Overall score
Kalorama
41.0/100
Silvan
46.2/100
Kalorama vs Silvan, VIC suburb comparison
Silvan for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
KaloramaSilvan
Crime rate
Kalorama
27.1 / 1k
Silvan
36.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kalorama
116
Silvan
10
Population
Kalorama
1,277
Silvan
1,323
Metric leadKalorama 5Silvan 32 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kalorama | Silvan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.0/100 | 46.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 39.0/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 27.1 / 1k | 36.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 21 | 21 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 116 | 10 |
| Planning activity | 23 | 45 |
| Population | 1,277 | 1,323 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Kalorama reads as a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks; Silvan is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Kalorama sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Silvan is further out with more breathing room.
Kalorama pulls ahead on walkability and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Silvan is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Kalorama generally means more sought-after housing, while Silvan leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Silvan, while Kalorama remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.