Overall score
Kambah
76.5/100
Mount Gambier
67.1/100
Kambah for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kambah
76.5/100
Mount Gambier
67.1/100
Crime rate
Kambah
16.5 / 1k
Mount Gambier
67.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kambah
260
Mount Gambier
554
Population
Kambah
15,670
Mount Gambier
25,591
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kambah | Mount Gambier |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 76.5/100 | 67.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 55.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 16.5 / 1k | 67.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 20 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | — |
| Public transport stops | — | 121 |
| Walkability | 92.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 260 | 554 |
| Planning activity | 16 | 197 |
| Population | 15,670 | 25,591 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 1/10 |
Across states, Kambah is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Mount Gambier is a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Gambier sits among greener hillside streets, while Kambah keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Kambah pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Mount Gambier is the better pick for schools and education options and walkability. On housing, Kambah sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Mount Gambier.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Kambah, while Mount Gambier remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.