Kiama vs Shellharbour, NSW Suburb Comparison

Kiama for retirees and families; Shellharbour for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KiamaShellharbour

Overall score

Kiama

72.1/100

Shellharbour

54.6/100

Crime rate

Kiama

34.7 / 1k

Shellharbour

73.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kiama

540

Shellharbour

187

Population

Kiama

7,904

Shellharbour

3,520

Metric leadKiama 9Shellharbour 31 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKiamaShellharbour
Overall score72.1/10054.6/100
Housing (desirability)59.9/10056.7/100
Crime rate34.7 / 1k73.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools34
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves1310
Public transport stops11458
Walkability100.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities540187
Planning activity7516
Green cover8.2%14.6%
Population7,9043,520
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/106/10

Comparison summary

Kiama reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Shellharbour is a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living.

On the data, Kiama is stronger for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Shellharbour answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook.

Kiama suits retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Shellharbour is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons