Kilburn vs Wingfield, SA Suburb Comparison

Kilburn for retirees and families; Wingfield for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KilburnWingfield

Overall score

Kilburn

35.1/100

Wingfield

30.2/100

Crime rate

Kilburn

118.4 / 1k

Wingfield

375.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kilburn

210

Wingfield

197

Population

Kilburn

5,633

Wingfield

440

Metric leadKilburn 7Wingfield 22 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKilburnWingfield
Overall score35.1/10030.2/100
Housing (desirability)38.7/10084.3/100
Crime rate118.4 / 1k375.8 / 1k
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops288
Walkability75.0/10018.0/100
Nearby amenities210197
Planning activity7652
Green cover2.9%0.0%
Population5,633440
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Kilburn is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Wingfield is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by. Kilburn sits closer to the city centre, whereas Wingfield is in a middle-ring position.

Kilburn pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Wingfield is the better pick for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Wingfield, while Kilburn remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons