Kingston vs Gosnells suburb comparison (TAS vs WA)

Kingston for retirees and investment; Gosnells for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KingstonGosnells

Overall score

Kingston

57.7/100

Gosnells

55.8/100

Crime rate

Kingston

107.0 / 1k

Gosnells

265.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kingston

90

Gosnells

449

Population

Kingston

12,288

Gosnells

21,149

Metric leadKingston 4Gosnells 6across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKingstonGosnells
Overall score57.7/10055.8/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10038.2/100
Crime rate107.0 / 1k265.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools17
Parks & reserves2040
Public transport stops64143
Walkability30.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities90449
Population12,28821,149
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/101/10

Comparison summary

Kingston (TAS) is a hillside established suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Gosnells (WA) is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Kingston sits among greener hillside streets, while Gosnells keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Kingston is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Gosnells answers with schools and education options and parks and reserves. On housing, Kingston sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Gosnells.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Kingston the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Gosnells.

Related comparisons