Kirkwood vs New Auckland, QLD Suburb Comparison

Kirkwood for value and schools; New Auckland for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KirkwoodNew Auckland

Overall score

Kirkwood

43.6/100

New Auckland

35.5/100

Crime rate

Kirkwood

85.5 / 1k

New Auckland

85.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kirkwood

29

New Auckland

29

Population

Kirkwood

2,513

New Auckland

5,266

Metric leadKirkwood 4New Auckland 42 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKirkwoodNew Auckland
Overall score43.6/10035.5/100
Housing (desirability)41.8/10043.3/100
Crime rate85.5 / 1k85.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)11.8/10011.8/100
Parks & reserves211
Walkability28.5/1001.5/100
Nearby amenities2929
Green cover59.2%12.1%
Population2,5135,266
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kirkwood is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and New Auckland is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

Kirkwood pulls ahead on housing affordability, walkability, and overall desirability, whereas New Auckland is the better pick for parks and reserves, plus a larger local community.

Choose Kirkwood if you are weighing retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward New Auckland for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons