Clinton vs Kirkwood, QLD suburb comparison

Clinton for families and schools; Kirkwood for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClintonKirkwood

Overall score

Clinton

56.8/100

Kirkwood

44.8/100

Crime rate

Clinton

52.8 / 1k

Kirkwood

52.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clinton

54

Kirkwood

8

Population

Clinton

6,170

Kirkwood

2,513

Metric leadClinton 5Kirkwood 3across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClintonKirkwood
Overall score56.8/10044.8/100
Housing (desirability)57.0/10066.7/100
Crime rate52.8 / 1k52.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves102
Walkability49.0/10028.5/100
Nearby amenities548
Population6,1702,513
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/105/10

Comparison summary

Clinton is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Kirkwood is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Clinton pulls ahead on parks and reserves and walkability, whereas Kirkwood is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Clinton generally means more approachable housing costs, while Kirkwood leans toward more sought-after housing.

Clinton suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Kirkwood is the stronger match for retirees and investors.

Related comparisons