Overall score
Clinton
56.9/100
West Gladstone
64.1/100
Clinton vs West Gladstone, QLD suburb comparison
Clinton for retirees and investment; West Gladstone for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ClintonWest Gladstone
Crime rate
Clinton
54.3 / 1k
West Gladstone
54.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clinton
54
West Gladstone
117
Population
Clinton
6,170
West Gladstone
4,844
Metric leadClinton 3West Gladstone 51 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesClinton
- Best for familiesWest Gladstone
- Best for investmentClinton
- Best for best valueClinton
- Best for best schoolsWest Gladstone
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clinton | West Gladstone |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.9/100 | 64.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.0/100 | 35.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 54.3 / 1k | 54.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 11 |
| Walkability | 49.0/100 | 72.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 54 | 117 |
| Population | 6,170 | 4,844 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Clinton reads as a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote; West Gladstone is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Clinton tends to lead on housing affordability and a larger local community, while West Gladstone stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.
Clinton suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas West Gladstone is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.