Clinton vs Kin Kora, QLD suburb comparison

Clinton for investment and value; Kin Kora for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClintonKin Kora

Overall score

Clinton

56.8/100

Kin Kora

50.3/100

Crime rate

Clinton

52.8 / 1k

Kin Kora

52.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clinton

54

Kin Kora

25

Population

Clinton

6,170

Kin Kora

2,396

Metric leadClinton 6Kin Kora 3across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClintonKin Kora
Overall score56.8/10050.3/100
Housing (desirability)57.0/10040.2/100
Crime rate52.8 / 1k52.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools23
Parks & reserves103
Walkability49.0/10019.0/100
Nearby amenities5425
Population6,1702,396
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/103/10

Comparison summary

Clinton reads as a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Kin Kora is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

Clinton pulls ahead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, whereas Kin Kora is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Clinton the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Kin Kora.

Related comparisons