Kurnell vs Taren Point, NSW Suburb Comparison

Kurnell for retirees and beach lifestyle; Taren Point for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KurnellTaren Point

Overall score

Kurnell

46.0/100

Taren Point

57.7/100

Crime rate

Kurnell

63.7 / 1k

Taren Point

46.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kurnell

60

Taren Point

112

Population

Kurnell

2,528

Taren Point

1,879

Metric leadKurnell 4Taren Point 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKurnellTaren Point
Overall score46.0/10057.7/100
Housing (desirability)48.8/10049.1/100
Crime rate63.7 / 1k46.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools17
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves82
Public transport stops7334
Walkability30.0/10059.0/100
Nearby amenities60112
Planning activity2215
Green cover17.0%5.0%
Population2,5281,879
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kurnell is a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living, and Taren Point is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap. Kurnell leans into coastal living, while Taren Point feels more inland and suburban in character.

Kurnell pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Taren Point is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and walkability. Kurnell generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Taren Point leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Kurnell if you are weighing retirees, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Taren Point for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons