Kurnell vs Woolooware, NSW Suburb Comparison

Kurnell for beach lifestyle and investment; Woolooware for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KurnellWoolooware

Overall score

Kurnell

46.0/100

Woolooware

58.9/100

Crime rate

Kurnell

63.7 / 1k

Woolooware

50.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kurnell

60

Woolooware

143

Population

Kurnell

2,528

Woolooware

5,060

Metric leadKurnell 2Woolooware 92 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKurnellWoolooware
Overall score46.0/10058.9/100
Housing (desirability)48.8/10055.3/100
Crime rate63.7 / 1k50.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools113
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves88
Public transport stops7364
Walkability30.0/10076.0/100
Nearby amenities60143
Planning activity2221
Green cover17.0%4.7%
Population2,5285,060
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Kurnell is a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living, while Woolooware is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Kurnell leans into coastal living, while Woolooware feels more inland and suburban in character.

On the data, Kurnell is stronger for housing affordability, public transport access, and a calmer planning outlook; Woolooware answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and walkability. Kurnell generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Woolooware leans toward more sought-after housing.

Kurnell suits people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Woolooware is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons