Lakelands vs San Remo, WA Suburb Comparison

Lakelands for value; San Remo for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LakelandsSan Remo

Overall score

Lakelands

38.5/100

San Remo

36.9/100

Crime rate

Lakelands

63.3 / 1k

San Remo

63.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lakelands

225

San Remo

24

Population

Lakelands

6,171

San Remo

1,022

Metric leadLakelands 6San Remo 32 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLakelandsSan Remo
Overall score38.5/10036.9/100
Housing (desirability)41.5/10053.8/100
Crime rate63.3 / 1k63.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools54
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops403
Walkability71.0/1006.5/100
Nearby amenities22524
Green cover1.7%8.9%
Population6,1711,022
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Lakelands is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and San Remo is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm. San Remo leans into coastal living, while Lakelands feels more inland and suburban in character.

Lakelands pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access, whereas San Remo is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Lakelands suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas San Remo is the stronger match for retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons