Parklands vs San Remo, WA Suburb Comparison

San Remo for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ParklandsSan Remo

Overall score

Parklands

23.7/100

San Remo

36.9/100

Crime rate

Parklands

63.3 / 1k

San Remo

63.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Parklands

48

San Remo

24

Population

Parklands

603

San Remo

1,022

Metric leadParklands 1San Remo 82 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryParklandsSan Remo
Overall score23.7/10036.9/100
Housing (desirability)13.9/10053.8/100
Crime rate63.3 / 1k63.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves12
Public transport stops3
Walkability0.0/1006.5/100
Nearby amenities4824
Green cover0.0%8.9%
Population6031,022
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/107/10

Comparison summary

Parklands is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while San Remo is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where San Remo is shaped by the coast, Parklands offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Parklands pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities, whereas San Remo is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.

On balance, retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer San Remo, while Parklands remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons