Overall score
Largs
35.1/100
Raworth
38.8/100
Largs vs Raworth, NSW Suburb Comparison
Largs for schools; Raworth for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
LargsRaworth
Crime rate
Largs
95.2 / 1k
Raworth
46.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Largs
26
Raworth
59
Population
Largs
1,962
Raworth
2,094
Metric leadLargs 4Raworth 72 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Largs | Raworth |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.1/100 | 38.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.7/100 | 54.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 95.2 / 1k | 46.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 28 | 38 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 26 | 59 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 12 |
| Green cover | 1.5% | 0.6% |
| Population | 1,962 | 2,094 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Largs is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, while Raworth is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by. Largs sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Raworth is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Largs is stronger for housing affordability, walkability, and a calmer planning outlook; Raworth answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.
On balance, families, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Raworth, while Largs remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.