Overall score
Largs
35.1/100
Morpeth
45.8/100
Largs vs Morpeth, NSW Suburb Comparison
Largs for value; Morpeth for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
LargsMorpeth
Crime rate
Largs
95.2 / 1k
Morpeth
46.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Largs
26
Morpeth
59
Population
Largs
1,962
Morpeth
1,686
Metric leadLargs 3Morpeth 82 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Largs | Morpeth |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.1/100 | 45.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.7/100 | 64.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 95.2 / 1k | 46.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 28 | 37 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 38.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 26 | 59 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 12 |
| Green cover | 1.5% | 3.8% |
| Population | 1,962 | 1,686 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Largs is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, and Morpeth is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby. Largs sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Morpeth is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Largs is stronger for housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and a larger local community; Morpeth answers with a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Largs suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Morpeth is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.