Overall score
Millers Forest
28.1/100
Morpeth
40.2/100
Millers Forest vs Morpeth, NSW suburb comparison
Millers Forest for retirees; Morpeth for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Millers ForestMorpeth
Crime rate
Millers Forest
105.6 / 1k
Morpeth
46.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Millers Forest
11
Morpeth
57
Population
Millers Forest
357
Morpeth
1,686
Metric leadMillers Forest 2Morpeth 62 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMillers Forest
- Best for familiesMorpeth
- Best for best valueMorpeth
- Best for best schoolsMorpeth
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Millers Forest | Morpeth |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 28.1/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.7/100 | 57.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 105.6 / 1k | 46.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 37 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 38.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 11 | 57 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 11 |
| Population | 357 | 1,686 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Millers Forest reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Morpeth is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby. Millers Forest sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Morpeth is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Millers Forest is stronger for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook; Morpeth answers with a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
Retirees may find Millers Forest the better fit, while families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Morpeth.