Overall score
Millers Forest
24.8/100
Morpeth
45.8/100
Millers Forest vs Morpeth, NSW Suburb Comparison
Morpeth for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Millers ForestMorpeth
Crime rate
Millers Forest
105.6 / 1k
Morpeth
46.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Millers Forest
12
Morpeth
59
Population
Millers Forest
357
Morpeth
1,686
Metric leadMillers Forest 1Morpeth 83 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Millers Forest | Morpeth |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 24.8/100 | 45.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 35.2/100 | 64.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 105.6 / 1k | 46.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 37 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 38.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 12 | 59 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 12 |
| Green cover | 1.2% | 3.8% |
| Population | 357 | 1,686 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Millers Forest reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Morpeth is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby. Millers Forest sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Morpeth is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Millers Forest is stronger for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook; Morpeth answers with a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability.
Retirees may find Millers Forest the better fit, while families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Morpeth.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.