Millers Forest vs Morpeth, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Millers Forest | Morpeth |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 28.2/100 | 40.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.7/100 | 57.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 112.0 / 1k | 52.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 37 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 38.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 11 | 57 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 10 |
| Population | 357 | 1,686 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 5/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesMillers Forest
- Best for familiesMorpeth
- Best for best valueMorpeth
- Best for best schoolsMorpeth
Comparison summary
Millers Forest and Morpeth offer different strengths across official suburb data. Morpeth leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours Morpeth; Housing (desirability) favours Millers Forest; Crime rate favours Morpeth. Quick verdicts: Retirees → Millers Forest, Families → Morpeth, Best value → Morpeth, Best schools → Morpeth.