Millers Forest vs Woodberry, NSW suburb comparison

Millers Forest for retirees and investment; Woodberry for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Millers ForestWoodberry

Overall score

Millers Forest

28.1/100

Woodberry

43.3/100

Crime rate

Millers Forest

105.6 / 1k

Woodberry

77.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Millers Forest

11

Woodberry

219

Population

Millers Forest

357

Woodberry

3,024

Metric leadMillers Forest 2Woodberry 8across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMillers ForestWoodberry
Overall score28.1/10043.3/100
Housing (desirability)59.7/10074.6/100
Crime rate105.6 / 1k77.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Parks & reserves3
Public transport stops1655
Walkability24.0/10047.0/100
Nearby amenities11219
Planning activity45
Population3573,024
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/101/10

Comparison summary

Millers Forest is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city, while Woodberry is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Millers Forest sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Woodberry is in a middle-ring position.

Millers Forest tends to lead on a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Woodberry stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Millers Forest generally means more sought-after housing, while Woodberry leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Millers Forest if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Woodberry for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons