Overall score
Chisholm
51.0/100
Woodberry
43.3/100
Chisholm vs Woodberry, NSW suburb comparison
Chisholm for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ChisholmWoodberry
Crime rate
Chisholm
77.2 / 1k
Woodberry
77.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chisholm
308
Woodberry
219
Population
Chisholm
4,577
Woodberry
3,024
Metric leadChisholm 4Woodberry 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chisholm | Woodberry |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.0/100 | 43.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 74.6/100 | 74.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 77.2 / 1k | 77.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 48 | 55 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 47.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 308 | 219 |
| Planning activity | 96 | 5 |
| Population | 4,577 | 3,024 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Chisholm is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Woodberry is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Chisholm is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities and overall desirability; Woodberry answers with a quieter safety profile and public transport access. Chisholm generally means more sought-after housing, while Woodberry leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Chisholm, while Woodberry remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.