Overall score
Lethbridge Park
42.7/100
Shanes Park
29.0/100
Lethbridge Park for investment and value; Shanes Park for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Lethbridge Park
42.7/100
Shanes Park
29.0/100
Crime rate
Lethbridge Park
194.3 / 1k
Shanes Park
68.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lethbridge Park
64
Shanes Park
8
Population
Lethbridge Park
4,730
Shanes Park
384
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lethbridge Park | Shanes Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.7/100 | 29.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.2/100 | 40.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 194.3 / 1k | 68.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 44 | 22 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 64 | 8 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 1 |
| Population | 4,730 | 384 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 4/10 |
Put side by side, Lethbridge Park is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Shanes Park is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm. Lethbridge Park sits among greener hillside streets, while Shanes Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Lethbridge Park pulls ahead on public transport access and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Shanes Park is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Lethbridge Park generally means more approachable housing costs, while Shanes Park leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Lethbridge Park, while Shanes Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.