Overall score
Shalvey
44.0/100
Shanes Park
29.0/100
Shalvey for families and investment; Shanes Park for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Shalvey
44.0/100
Shanes Park
29.0/100
Crime rate
Shalvey
194.4 / 1k
Shanes Park
68.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Shalvey
42
Shanes Park
8
Population
Shalvey
3,455
Shanes Park
384
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Shalvey | Shanes Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.0/100 | 29.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 58.6/100 | 40.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 194.4 / 1k | 68.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 60 | 22 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 42 | 8 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 1 |
| Population | 3,455 | 384 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 4/10 |
Put side by side, Shalvey is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with approachable housing and suburban calm, and Shanes Park is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm. Shalvey sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Shanes Park is further out with more breathing room.
On the data, Shalvey is stronger for housing affordability and public transport access; Shanes Park answers with a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook. Shalvey generally means more approachable housing costs, while Shanes Park leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Shalvey, while Shanes Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.