Overall score
Little Grove
38.3/100
Mount Melville
37.8/100
Little Grove for retirees and investment; Mount Melville for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Little Grove
38.3/100
Mount Melville
37.8/100
Crime rate
Little Grove
2229.3 / 1k
Mount Melville
3377.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Little Grove
5
Mount Melville
15
Population
Little Grove
1,508
Mount Melville
1,007
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Little Grove | Mount Melville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.3/100 | 37.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 58.6/100 | 24.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 2229.3 / 1k | 3377.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | — |
| Public transport stops | 8 | 6 |
| Walkability | 12.0/100 | 40.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 5 | 15 |
| Population | 1,508 | 1,007 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 5/10 |
Little Grove is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Mount Melville is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Melville sits among greener hillside streets, while Little Grove keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Little Grove pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Mount Melville is the better pick for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Little Grove, while Mount Melville remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.