Little Grove vs Mount Melville, WA suburb comparison

Little Grove for retirees and investment; Mount Melville for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Little GroveMount Melville

Overall score

Little Grove

38.3/100

Mount Melville

37.8/100

Crime rate

Little Grove

2229.3 / 1k

Mount Melville

3377.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Little Grove

5

Mount Melville

15

Population

Little Grove

1,508

Mount Melville

1,007

Metric leadLittle Grove 6Mount Melville 3across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLittle GroveMount Melville
Overall score38.3/10037.8/100
Housing (desirability)58.6/10024.6/100
Crime rate2229.3 / 1k3377.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops86
Walkability12.0/10040.0/100
Nearby amenities515
Population1,5081,007
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/105/10

Comparison summary

Little Grove is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Mount Melville is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Melville sits among greener hillside streets, while Little Grove keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Little Grove pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Mount Melville is the better pick for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Little Grove, while Mount Melville remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons