Mount Clarence vs Mount Melville, WA Suburb Comparison

Mount Clarence for retirees and families; Mount Melville for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount ClarenceMount Melville

Overall score

Mount Clarence

47.4/100

Mount Melville

51.2/100

Crime rate

Mount Clarence

50.0 / 1k

Mount Melville

50.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Clarence

37

Mount Melville

20

Population

Mount Clarence

728

Mount Melville

1,007

Metric leadMount Clarence 2Mount Melville 72 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount ClarenceMount Melville
Overall score47.4/10051.2/100
Housing (desirability)45.0/10055.2/100
Crime rate50.0 / 1k50.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops46
Walkability8.0/10040.0/100
Nearby amenities3720
Green cover1.2%30.2%
Population7281,007
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/105/10

Comparison summary

Mount Clarence reads as a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living; Mount Melville is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Clarence leans into coastal living, while Mount Melville feels more inland and suburban in character.

Mount Clarence pulls ahead on housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Mount Melville is the better pick for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.

Mount Clarence suits retirees, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Mount Melville is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons