Overall score
Lockrose
30.5/100
Lockyer Waters
35.0/100
Lockrose for retirees and investment; Lockyer Waters for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Lockrose
30.5/100
Lockyer Waters
35.0/100
Crime rate
Lockrose
46.9 / 1k
Lockyer Waters
57.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lockrose
1
Lockyer Waters
1
Population
Lockrose
564
Lockyer Waters
538
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lockrose | Lockyer Waters |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.5/100 | 35.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.0/100 | 41.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 46.9 / 1k | 57.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 27.4/100 | 27.4/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 1 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 564 | 538 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Lockrose reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Lockyer Waters is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
On the data, Lockrose is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a larger local community; Lockyer Waters answers with overall desirability.
Lockrose suits retirees, investors, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Lockyer Waters is the stronger match for families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.