Lockrose vs Regency Downs, QLD suburb comparison

Lockrose for schools; Regency Downs for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LockroseRegency Downs

Overall score

Lockrose

46.3/100

Regency Downs

52.2/100

Crime rate

Lockrose

27.4 / 1k

Regency Downs

39.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lockrose

1

Regency Downs

0

Population

Lockrose

564

Regency Downs

2,623

Metric leadLockrose 2Regency Downs 41 tiedacross 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLockroseRegency Downs
Overall score46.3/10052.2/100
Housing (desirability)60.6/10080.3/100
Crime rate27.4 / 1k39.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities10
Population5642,623
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Lockrose is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Regency Downs is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Lockrose is stronger for a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities; Regency Downs answers with housing affordability and overall desirability.

Choose Lockrose if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Regency Downs for families and investors.

Related comparisons