Lockrose vs Regency Downs, QLD Suburb Comparison

Lockrose for families; Regency Downs for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LockroseRegency Downs

Overall score

Lockrose

30.5/100

Regency Downs

35.1/100

Crime rate

Lockrose

46.9 / 1k

Regency Downs

64.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lockrose

1

Regency Downs

0

Population

Lockrose

564

Regency Downs

2,623

Metric leadLockrose 3Regency Downs 33 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLockroseRegency Downs
Overall score30.5/10035.1/100
Housing (desirability)49.0/10048.4/100
Crime rate46.9 / 1k64.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)27.4/10027.4/100
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities10
Green cover0.0%0.0%
Population5642,623
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Lockrose is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Regency Downs is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Lockrose is stronger for a quieter safety profile, plus nearby cafés and amenities; Regency Downs answers with housing affordability, overall desirability, and a larger local community.

Choose Lockrose if you are weighing retirees and households prioritising schools; lean toward Regency Downs for families, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons