Overall score
Kensington Grove
51.2/100
Regency Downs
52.2/100
Kensington Grove for retirees and investment; Regency Downs for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kensington Grove
51.2/100
Regency Downs
52.2/100
Crime rate
Kensington Grove
39.4 / 1k
Regency Downs
39.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kensington Grove
0
Regency Downs
0
Population
Kensington Grove
2,050
Regency Downs
2,623
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kensington Grove | Regency Downs |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.2/100 | 52.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 80.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 39.4 / 1k | 39.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 2,050 | 2,623 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Kensington Grove is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Regency Downs is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Kensington Grove tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Regency Downs stands out for a larger local community. On housing, Kensington Grove sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Regency Downs.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Kensington Grove, while Regency Downs remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.