Kensington Grove vs Regency Downs, QLD suburb comparison

Kensington Grove for retirees and investment; Regency Downs for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Kensington GroveRegency Downs

Overall score

Kensington Grove

51.2/100

Regency Downs

52.2/100

Crime rate

Kensington Grove

39.4 / 1k

Regency Downs

39.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kensington Grove

0

Regency Downs

0

Population

Kensington Grove

2,050

Regency Downs

2,623

Metric leadKensington Grove 2Regency Downs 32 tiedacross 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKensington GroveRegency Downs
Overall score51.2/10052.2/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10080.3/100
Crime rate39.4 / 1k39.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities00
Population2,0502,623
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Kensington Grove is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Regency Downs is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Kensington Grove tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Regency Downs stands out for a larger local community. On housing, Kensington Grove sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Regency Downs.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Kensington Grove, while Regency Downs remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons