Overall score
Glenore Grove
35.1/100
Regency Downs
35.1/100
Glenore Grove for retirees and families; Regency Downs for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Glenore Grove
35.1/100
Regency Downs
35.1/100
Crime rate
Glenore Grove
47.0 / 1k
Regency Downs
64.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glenore Grove
4
Regency Downs
0
Population
Glenore Grove
953
Regency Downs
2,623
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glenore Grove | Regency Downs |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.1/100 | 35.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 47.0 / 1k | 64.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 27.4/100 | 27.4/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 4 | 0 |
| Green cover | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Population | 953 | 2,623 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Glenore Grove is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Regency Downs is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Glenore Grove pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Regency Downs is the better pick for overall desirability and a larger local community.
Glenore Grove suits retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Regency Downs is the stronger match for families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.