Glenore Grove vs Regency Downs, QLD Suburb Comparison

Glenore Grove for retirees and families; Regency Downs for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Glenore GroveRegency Downs

Overall score

Glenore Grove

35.1/100

Regency Downs

35.1/100

Crime rate

Glenore Grove

47.0 / 1k

Regency Downs

64.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Glenore Grove

4

Regency Downs

0

Population

Glenore Grove

953

Regency Downs

2,623

Metric leadGlenore Grove 4Regency Downs 14 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGlenore GroveRegency Downs
Overall score35.1/10035.1/100
Housing (desirability)56.4/10048.4/100
Crime rate47.0 / 1k64.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)27.4/10027.4/100
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities40
Green cover0.7%0.0%
Population9532,623
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Glenore Grove is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Regency Downs is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Glenore Grove pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Regency Downs is the better pick for overall desirability and a larger local community.

Glenore Grove suits retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Regency Downs is the stronger match for families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons