Overall score
Glenore Grove
49.5/100
Regency Downs
51.7/100
Glenore Grove for retirees and investment; Regency Downs for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Glenore Grove
49.5/100
Regency Downs
51.7/100
Crime rate
Glenore Grove
29.7 / 1k
Regency Downs
41.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glenore Grove
4
Regency Downs
0
Population
Glenore Grove
953
Regency Downs
2,623
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glenore Grove | Regency Downs |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.5/100 | 51.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 80.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.7 / 1k | 41.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 4 | 0 |
| Population | 953 | 2,623 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Glenore Grove is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Regency Downs is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Glenore Grove pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Regency Downs is the better pick for overall desirability and a larger local community.
Glenore Grove suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Regency Downs is the stronger match for families.