Mahomets Flats vs Wandina, WA Suburb Comparison

Mahomets Flats for families and investment; Wandina for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mahomets FlatsWandina

Overall score

Mahomets Flats

41.0/100

Wandina

39.4/100

Crime rate

Mahomets Flats

132.8 / 1k

Wandina

132.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mahomets Flats

30

Wandina

36

Population

Mahomets Flats

806

Wandina

4,375

Metric leadMahomets Flats 4Wandina 62 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMahomets FlatsWandina
Overall score41.0/10039.4/100
Housing (desirability)67.6/10035.9/100
Crime rate132.8 / 1k132.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools91
Weather (desirability)2.8/1002.8/100
Parks & reserves510
Public transport stops1021
Walkability21.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities3036
Green cover13.3%4.9%
Population8064,375
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/107/10

Comparison summary

Mahomets Flats reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; Wandina is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Mahomets Flats pulls ahead on schools and education options, whereas Wandina is the better pick for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access. On housing, Mahomets Flats sits in a affordable band, compared with a gently premium feel in Wandina.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Mahomets Flats the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Wandina.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons