Marcoola vs Twin Waters, QLD Suburb Comparison

Marcoola for schools; Twin Waters for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MarcoolaTwin Waters

Overall score

Marcoola

50.9/100

Twin Waters

59.5/100

Crime rate

Marcoola

50.4 / 1k

Twin Waters

50.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Marcoola

13

Twin Waters

41

Population

Marcoola

3,355

Twin Waters

2,966

Metric leadMarcoola 4Twin Waters 51 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMarcoolaTwin Waters
Overall score50.9/10059.5/100
Housing (desirability)57.8/10053.0/100
Crime rate50.4 / 1k50.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)37.3/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves92
Public transport stops21—
Walkability30.0/10046.0/100
Nearby amenities1341
Planning activity1—
Green cover1.8%27.1%
Population3,3552,966
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Marcoola is a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living, and Twin Waters is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone.

On the data, Marcoola is stronger for parks and reserves, plus a larger local community; Twin Waters answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Twin Waters, while Marcoola remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons