Overall score
Marcoola
50.9/100
Point Arkwright
41.2/100
Marcoola for investment and value; Point Arkwright for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Marcoola
50.9/100
Point Arkwright
41.2/100
Crime rate
Marcoola
50.4 / 1k
Point Arkwright
20.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Marcoola
13
Point Arkwright
16
Population
Marcoola
3,355
Point Arkwright
309
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Marcoola | Point Arkwright |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.9/100 | 41.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.8/100 | 48.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 50.4 / 1k | 20.0 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 21 | — |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 13 | 16 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Green cover | 1.8% | 2.0% |
| Population | 3,355 | 309 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Marcoola reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living; Point Arkwright is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living.
Marcoola tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability, while Point Arkwright stands out for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Marcoola generally means more sought-after housing, while Point Arkwright leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Marcoola the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Point Arkwright.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.