Marcoola vs Point Arkwright, QLD suburb comparison

Marcoola for investment and value; Point Arkwright for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MarcoolaPoint Arkwright

Overall score

Marcoola

38.1/100

Point Arkwright

32.8/100

Crime rate

Marcoola

26.9 / 1k

Point Arkwright

11.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Marcoola

2

Point Arkwright

14

Population

Marcoola

3,355

Point Arkwright

309

Metric leadMarcoola 5Point Arkwright 3across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMarcoolaPoint Arkwright
Overall score38.1/10032.8/100
Housing (desirability)41.6/10022.5/100
Crime rate26.9 / 1k11.2 / 1k
Parks & reserves91
Public transport stops21
Walkability30.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities214
Planning activity1
Population3,355309
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/107/10

Comparison summary

Marcoola reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living; Point Arkwright is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living.

Marcoola tends to lead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, while Point Arkwright stands out for a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities. Marcoola generally means more sought-after housing, while Point Arkwright leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Marcoola the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Point Arkwright.

Related comparisons