Marcoola vs Point Arkwright, QLD Suburb Comparison

Marcoola for investment and value; Point Arkwright for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MarcoolaPoint Arkwright

Overall score

Marcoola

50.9/100

Point Arkwright

41.2/100

Crime rate

Marcoola

50.4 / 1k

Point Arkwright

20.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Marcoola

13

Point Arkwright

16

Population

Marcoola

3,355

Point Arkwright

309

Metric leadMarcoola 5Point Arkwright 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMarcoolaPoint Arkwright
Overall score50.9/10041.2/100
Housing (desirability)57.8/10048.3/100
Crime rate50.4 / 1k20.0 / 1k
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Parks & reserves91
Public transport stops21—
Walkability30.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities1316
Planning activity1—
Green cover1.8%2.0%
Population3,355309
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/107/10

Comparison summary

Marcoola reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living; Point Arkwright is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living.

Marcoola tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability, while Point Arkwright stands out for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Marcoola generally means more sought-after housing, while Point Arkwright leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Marcoola the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Point Arkwright.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons