Overall score
Marcoola
38.1/100
Point Arkwright
32.8/100
Marcoola for investment and value; Point Arkwright for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Marcoola
38.1/100
Point Arkwright
32.8/100
Crime rate
Marcoola
26.9 / 1k
Point Arkwright
11.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Marcoola
2
Point Arkwright
14
Population
Marcoola
3,355
Point Arkwright
309
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Marcoola | Point Arkwright |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.1/100 | 32.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 41.6/100 | 22.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 26.9 / 1k | 11.2 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 21 | — |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 14 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Population | 3,355 | 309 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Marcoola reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living; Point Arkwright is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living.
Marcoola tends to lead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, while Point Arkwright stands out for a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities. Marcoola generally means more sought-after housing, while Point Arkwright leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Marcoola the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Point Arkwright.