Overall score
Mount Coolum
55.6/100
Point Arkwright
41.2/100
Mount Coolum for families and value; Point Arkwright for retirees and beach lifestyle.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Coolum
55.6/100
Point Arkwright
41.2/100
Crime rate
Mount Coolum
19.2 / 1k
Point Arkwright
20.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Coolum
48
Point Arkwright
16
Population
Mount Coolum
4,545
Point Arkwright
309
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Coolum | Point Arkwright |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.6/100 | 41.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 52.6/100 | 48.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 19.2 / 1k | 20.0 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 8 | — |
| Walkability | 41.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 48 | 16 |
| Green cover | 3.1% | 2.0% |
| Population | 4,545 | 309 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Mount Coolum is a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living, and Point Arkwright is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living. Mount Coolum sits among greener hillside streets, while Point Arkwright keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Mount Coolum pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves, whereas Point Arkwright is the better pick for easy access to the coast. Mount Coolum generally means more sought-after housing, while Point Arkwright leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
On balance, retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mount Coolum, while Point Arkwright remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.