Overall score
Marshall
42.0/100
St Albans Park
41.8/100
Marshall for retirees and schools; St Albans Park for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Marshall
42.0/100
St Albans Park
41.8/100
Crime rate
Marshall
23.8 / 1k
St Albans Park
35.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Marshall
78
St Albans Park
35
Population
Marshall
2,299
St Albans Park
4,942
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Marshall | St Albans Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.0/100 | 41.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.8/100 | 75.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.8 / 1k | 35.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 19 | 31 |
| Walkability | 28.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 78 | 35 |
| Planning activity | 27 | 9 |
| Green cover | 13.6% | 2.4% |
| Population | 2,299 | 4,942 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Marshall is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and St Albans Park is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Marshall sits in a middle-ring position, whereas St Albans Park is further out with more breathing room.
On the data, Marshall is stronger for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; St Albans Park answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access. On housing, Marshall sits in a gently premium band, compared with a affordable feel in St Albans Park.
Households prioritising schools may find Marshall the better fit, while retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer St Albans Park.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.