Connewarre vs St Albans Park, VIC suburb comparison

Connewarre for retirees and beach lifestyle; St Albans Park for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ConnewarreSt Albans Park

Overall score

Connewarre

25.8/100

St Albans Park

50.0/100

Crime rate

Connewarre

35.8 / 1k

St Albans Park

33.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Connewarre

6

St Albans Park

35

Population

Connewarre

953

St Albans Park

4,942

Metric leadConnewarre 1St Albans Park 9across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryConnewarreSt Albans Park
Overall score25.8/10050.0/100
Housing (desirability)25.3/10081.2/100
Crime rate35.8 / 1k33.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools3
Parks & reserves16
Public transport stops631
Walkability9.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities635
Planning activity149
Population9534,942
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Connewarre is a beachside smaller community where the coast sets the tone, and St Albans Park is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Where Connewarre is shaped by the coast, St Albans Park offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Connewarre is stronger for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage; St Albans Park answers with housing affordability and parks and reserves. Connewarre generally means more sought-after housing, while St Albans Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees and families may find Connewarre the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer St Albans Park.

Related comparisons