Charlemont vs Connewarre, VIC Suburb Comparison

Charlemont for families and investment; Connewarre for beach lifestyle and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CharlemontConnewarre

Overall score

Charlemont

41.4/100

Connewarre

43.7/100

Crime rate

Charlemont

54.5 / 1k

Connewarre

37.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Charlemont

49

Connewarre

9

Population

Charlemont

2,612

Connewarre

953

Metric leadCharlemont 7Connewarre 41 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCharlemontConnewarre
Overall score41.4/10043.7/100
Housing (desirability)46.5/10040.8/100
Crime rate54.5 / 1k37.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops156
Walkability22.5/1009.0/100
Nearby amenities499
Planning activity1814
Green cover1.7%0.0%
Population2,612953
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Charlemont is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Connewarre is a beachside smaller community where the coast sets the tone. Connewarre leans into coastal living, while Charlemont feels more inland and suburban in character.

Charlemont pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Connewarre is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Charlemont generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Connewarre leans toward more sought-after housing.

Charlemont suits families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Connewarre is the stronger match for people chasing a beach lifestyle.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons