Charlemont vs St Albans Park, VIC suburb comparison

Charlemont for retirees and schools; St Albans Park for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CharlemontSt Albans Park

Overall score

Charlemont

47.7/100

St Albans Park

50.0/100

Crime rate

Charlemont

51.4 / 1k

St Albans Park

33.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Charlemont

46

St Albans Park

35

Population

Charlemont

2,612

St Albans Park

4,942

Metric leadCharlemont 2St Albans Park 9across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCharlemontSt Albans Park
Overall score47.7/10050.0/100
Housing (desirability)62.6/10081.2/100
Crime rate51.4 / 1k33.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Parks & reserves26
Public transport stops1531
Walkability22.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities4635
Planning activity189
Population2,6124,942
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/102/10

Comparison summary

Charlemont reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; St Albans Park is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Charlemont sits in a middle-ring position, whereas St Albans Park is further out with more breathing room.

On the data, Charlemont is stronger for a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities; St Albans Park answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. On housing, Charlemont sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in St Albans Park.

Charlemont suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas St Albans Park is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons