Overall score
Charlemont
41.4/100
St Albans Park
41.8/100
Charlemont for families and schools; St Albans Park for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Charlemont
41.4/100
St Albans Park
41.8/100
Crime rate
Charlemont
54.5 / 1k
St Albans Park
35.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Charlemont
49
St Albans Park
35
Population
Charlemont
2,612
St Albans Park
4,942
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Charlemont | St Albans Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.4/100 | 41.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.5/100 | 75.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 54.5 / 1k | 35.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 15 | 31 |
| Walkability | 22.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 49 | 35 |
| Planning activity | 18 | 9 |
| Green cover | 1.7% | 2.4% |
| Population | 2,612 | 4,942 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 2/10 |
Charlemont reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; St Albans Park is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Charlemont sits in a middle-ring position, whereas St Albans Park is further out with more breathing room.
On the data, Charlemont is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage; St Albans Park answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options. On housing, Charlemont sits in a gently premium band, compared with a affordable feel in St Albans Park.
Charlemont suits retirees and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas St Albans Park is the stronger match for families, investors, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.