Overall score
Charlemont
47.7/100
St Albans Park
50.0/100
Charlemont for retirees and schools; St Albans Park for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Charlemont
47.7/100
St Albans Park
50.0/100
Crime rate
Charlemont
51.4 / 1k
St Albans Park
33.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Charlemont
46
St Albans Park
35
Population
Charlemont
2,612
St Albans Park
4,942
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Charlemont | St Albans Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.7/100 | 50.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.6/100 | 81.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 51.4 / 1k | 33.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 15 | 31 |
| Walkability | 22.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 46 | 35 |
| Planning activity | 18 | 9 |
| Population | 2,612 | 4,942 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 2/10 |
Charlemont reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; St Albans Park is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Charlemont sits in a middle-ring position, whereas St Albans Park is further out with more breathing room.
On the data, Charlemont is stronger for a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities; St Albans Park answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. On housing, Charlemont sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in St Albans Park.
Charlemont suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas St Albans Park is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.