Moolap vs St Albans Park, VIC Suburb Comparison

Moolap for beach lifestyle and schools; St Albans Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MoolapSt Albans Park

Overall score

Moolap

34.1/100

St Albans Park

41.8/100

Crime rate

Moolap

105.0 / 1k

St Albans Park

35.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Moolap

48

St Albans Park

35

Population

Moolap

1,825

St Albans Park

4,942

Metric leadMoolap 3St Albans Park 81 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMoolapSt Albans Park
Overall score34.1/10041.8/100
Housing (desirability)52.4/10075.2/100
Crime rate105.0 / 1k35.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—6
Public transport stops2731
Walkability32.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities4835
Planning activity599
Green cover0.1%2.4%
Population1,8254,942
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Moolap is a beachside smaller community where the coast sets the tone, and St Albans Park is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Where Moolap is shaped by the coast, St Albans Park offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Moolap pulls ahead on housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas St Albans Park is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access. Moolap generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while St Albans Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Moolap if you are weighing people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors; lean toward St Albans Park for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons