Overall score
Marshall
42.3/100
Whittington
42.2/100
Marshall for retirees and families; Whittington for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Marshall
42.3/100
Whittington
42.2/100
Crime rate
Marshall
26.2 / 1k
Whittington
178.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Marshall
76
Whittington
32
Population
Marshall
2,299
Whittington
3,990
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Marshall | Whittington |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.3/100 | 42.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.4/100 | 81.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 26.2 / 1k | 178.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 19 | 23 |
| Walkability | 28.5/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 76 | 32 |
| Planning activity | 27 | 25 |
| Population | 2,299 | 3,990 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Marshall is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Whittington is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with approachable housing and suburban calm. Marshall sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Whittington is further out with more breathing room.
Marshall tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities, while Whittington stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options. On housing, Marshall sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Whittington.
Choose Marshall if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Whittington for investors and value-focused buyers.