Maryknoll vs Pakenham Upper, VIC Suburb Comparison

Maryknoll for families; Pakenham Upper for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MaryknollPakenham Upper

Overall score

Maryknoll

52.5/100

Pakenham Upper

62.0/100

Crime rate

Maryknoll

19.8 / 1k

Pakenham Upper

29.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Maryknoll

17

Pakenham Upper

10

Population

Maryknoll

646

Pakenham Upper

1,196

Metric leadMaryknoll 4Pakenham Upper 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMaryknollPakenham Upper
Overall score52.5/10062.0/100
Housing (desirability)49.4/10051.6/100
Crime rate19.8 / 1k29.5 / 1k
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves15
Public transport stops—13
Walkability0.0/10019.5/100
Nearby amenities1710
Planning activity1138
Green cover19.8%17.3%
Population6461,196
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Maryknoll is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, while Pakenham Upper is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.

On the data, Maryknoll is stronger for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability; Pakenham Upper answers with parks and reserves, walkability, and a larger local community.

Families may find Maryknoll the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Pakenham Upper.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons